Jump to content


Working group for new FAI paragliding discipline XC Open Distance Paragliding


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Bùi Thái Giang

Bùi Thái Giang

    Advanced Member

  • Root Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,160 posts
  • Handphone:0903439760
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hà Nội

Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:23 AM

Đây là đề xuất của các phi công Ba Lan về nội dung thi đấu mới XC Open Distance, sẽ bàn bạc ở Đài Loan 16-19/2

FAQ
1.   What is „XC Open Distance Paragliding"?
XCODP is a distinct type of paragliding activity. You fly as far as you can, without pre-defined route or landing point. You can set a goal beforehand if you like, but you don't have to stick to it if weather changes. You simply adjust your route to make the best of the day. Only the distance counts, time is not as important as in the racing, though you have to be fast to fly far. For many pilots this way of flying is the essence of paragliding.

2.   It is allowed to set open distance tasks in current paragliding competitions. Why do we need another XC discipline?
Yes, OD tasks are allowed but there is no cat. 1 OD competitions as such - hence there is no Open Distance World Champion title for the discipline. The cat. 2 winner title is not enough to attract sponsors, grants, financing etc. Especially for those who would like to compete but are not too much into crazy racing over sharp rocks.

3.   Should there be a separate competition category and scoring within WPRS created?
Yes. National Teams in Open Distance flying would be formed on the basis of such ranking. Of course pilots can participate in both - the racing and the open distance competitions - but scoring should be kept separate so that racing points don't count for open distance and vice versa.

4.   How to play Open Distance comps?
In terms of time and place there is no big difference to classic racing comps. Pilots meet in a given place (offering good conditions, easy retrieve in most common directions etc). The comps last a number of days, with minimal number of tasks required to make the comp valid.

Task validation proposal:
- At least 20% pilots reach min. distance of 30km. The winner scores 1000 points, others get proportion of the best pilot's points based on a flown distance.
- At least 10% pilots reach min. distance of 30km. Winner scores 500 points, others get a proportion of the best pilot's points based on a flown distance.
- At least 1 pilot reaches min. distance of 30km. Winner scores 250 points, others get a proportion of the best pilot's pints based on a flown distance.

Types of tasks:
Only Open Distance tasks with given start cylinder and preset landing time, with following options:
- flight in any direction optimized via 3 turn points (any)
- flight in any direction optimized along start - landing straight line
- flight along given axis; landing place is projected on the axis
- flight via given turning point* and then optimized via 3 turning points, straight line or an axis

(*) safety reasons (weather conditions, airspace, big cities etc); not more than 15km from starting point

5.   How will out-and-return and triangle flights be scored during comps?
Since OD format focuses on the distance covered during flight, the out-and-return and triangle flights will be scored same as classic open distance flights. It is possible that some organizers will award bonus points for certain routes or landing zones due to local laws/terrain/weather conditions, yet basically it is only the distance that counts.

6.   CIVL has decided to run online WXC and announces its winners. Is this not enough?
Of course it's good that CIVL listens to the voice of community and reacts to trends, but it's not enough. Nice diploma is nice but it doesn't mean much in terms of prestige and definitely not enough to help to attract sponsors.

Bringing up a new discipline will open door to a new competition format - Open Distance flying, thus creating a whole new scheme of champions, coaches and national teams, opening new avenues of seeking sponsorship.

7.   What is the future of WXC platforms?
Many national WXC platforms exist rather as personal flight log books than a competition - a place where you can compare flights, compare your score against others on a given date, sum up your kms etc. Even as they can be used as rankings constituting national OD teams, their role as a fundament in determining national/world champions is subject to dispute.

Basically open distance flying format and technology are created to exist together. In this way something like Open Distance World Cup is possible - instead of going to one place and praying for weather we could open, let's say, 21 days' window during which at least 6 declared flights would have to be made and best 3 flights would count for a round. We can have few rounds (based on the northern hemisphere seasons): Winter - South Africa, Australia; Spring - Alps; Summer - Central Europe flatlands; Autumn - Brasil.

8.   Aren't speed and distance flying the same? In both formats pilots have to fly a number of kilometers in thermals.
Let's compare sprinters and marathon runners. They both do run, but that's where similarities end. All the rest is different - how they train, what they eat, what shoes they use, even how they are physically built. Sprint runners have big muscles that deliver lots of power in few seconds while marathoners are very fit, some even look skinny but they can run for hours. There is no way the same runner would be successful in both disciplines.

It looks just the same with PG racing and open distance flying. Yes - it is both about flying in thermals and yes, it is both about time and distance. All the rest is different, including safety.

Now, look at WXC, XContest or XC-Open World Series results and compare them to the WPRS scheme. You'll find a number of same names on both lists, but the majority will be always different. Why? Simply because these disciplines are different - they require different preparation, different tactics, different physical and mental condition etc. It's also about preferences. Hundreds of pilots are not willing to risk flying into the lee side turning points, to race full-bar just a few meters over a sharp ridge or simply land on the goal in the middle of a super-day. But it doesn't mean those pilots don't want to compete. Race tasks often force pilots to take risks they are not ready. In contrast, open distance flying emphasizes prudence, integrity and meteorological skills of independently flying pilots - something highly desirable in our sport.

9.   How to do it?
Creating new discipline calls for serious changes in official rules, starting with Sporting Code. Thus, we need time for discussion, determining legal procedures, gathering opinions etc. Perhaps the best solution for now is to delegate an international working group in order to prepare detailed scheme, ready for implementing at the next CIVL meeting.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users